I'm sure you can guess where I stood on the issue.
Of course she'd already checked out REAL sources such as an OWS blogger. That's kind of hard to compete with, you know.
My personal blog for news and musings, with occasional info for my MBA, MS Finance and undergrad students at University of Houston-Clear Lake (UHCL). Thanks for looking.
Jobs's theory of decline was elegant and simple as an iPad, and when I asked business leaders about it the past few weeks, they agreed, some with the kind of engagement that suggested maybe their own companies had experienced such troubles.
Noonan, Peggy. WSJ. 11/18/11. A Caveman Won't Beat a Salesman.
Man, ain't THIS the truth! We see this all the time! The belief that a better salesman can fix things is always flawed.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was pressed at a White House briefing on the number of millionaires who pay taxes at a lower rate than middle-income families. He demurred, saying that people who make most of their money in wages pay taxes at a higher rate, while those who get most of their income from investments pay at lower rates.
"So it really depends on what is your profession, where's the source of your income, what's the specific circumstances you face, and the averages won't really capture that," Geithner said.
This from the SecTreas that didn't pay his taxes until he was nominated. Fat lot he knows about the situation, evidently. If you work as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, you don't pay taxes. Is that how it works?The Office of Career Services Presents the 2011 GULF COAST JOB FAIR
University of Houston-Clear Lake, Bayou Building, Atrium I & II
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
1:30 PM – 4:00 PM
Don’t miss out on this opportunity to connect with companies and organizations from various industries looking to connect with UHCL students and alumni!
Visit www.uhcl.edu/jobfairs for more information and to register!
We are grateful to our sponsor level employers for helping to support this event: Enterprise Holdings, ALS Environmental, Dahill, David McDavid Automotive Group, MetLife and Verizon Wireless.
Attending Employers:
I have absolutely no problem paying more taxes. None.
What I have a problem with is how the money is spent. If the incremental money could be directed to defined and deserved recipients. I would be thrilled to write the check.
The problem I have is not on the revenue side, its on the expenditure side. Too much money is wasted on bureaucracy, adminis-trivia, pensions and over expansive federal employment.
So I'm a resounding yes on more taxes, but an attachment to the funding to be directly spent on approved programs. If a program doesn't deliver 95pct or better to its intended recipients, it should be put on hold until it does.
An example of what he's against can be seen in last week's announcement by SecAg Vilsak that each dollar of federal food stamps to recipients produces $1.84 in economic benefit, hence food stamps are the most quick and direct form of economic stimulus.
Nobody thought to ask how much it costs to provide a dollar of benefits, via the state and federal government, to a recipient. I bet it's more than $1.84.
(Actually, I thought unemployment benefits were the most direct form of economic stimulus. That's what Speaker Pelosi said, at least.)
Until people take the politics out of federal spending (buying votes, bailing out unions and Wall Street, buying Congress, etc.) nothing's going to solve the budget crisis.